California
Association
for
Medical Laboratory Technology
Distance Learning Program
|
An Update
On Autoimmune Diseases Course
Number: DL-987 © California Association
for Medical Laboratory Technology. CAMLT is approved by the California Department
of Health Services as a 1895 Mowry Ave, Suite 112 Notification of Distance Learning Deadline |
| This course is configured to be completed on-line. You can register
for the course, submit secure payment using a credit card via PayPal,
take the quiz on-line and receive your graded score.
If you pass, your certificate will be mailed to you from
the CAMLT office. If you fail, you must submit new payment and obtain a new PayPal receipt each time you take the test. A certificate will be issued only if you have paid for re-taking the course and you pass the test. If you want to submit your registration and quiz via fax or mail you should print the Adobe Acrobat version of the course which includes the required Registration/Quiz form. |
| Links to: On-line REGISTRATION, PAYMENT and QUIZ Printable Acrobat version of this course * Review Questions at the end of this Course Other Distance Learning Courses |
|
An Update On Autoimmune Diseases
OBJECTIVES
Upon completion of this course, the participant will be able to:
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
The relationship between genetic susceptibility and environmental
factors in the development of autoimmunity and autoimmune diseases is extremely
complex. Many of the exogenous triggers appear years before the development
of the disease. Consequently, knowing the exact effect of environmental agents
is very difficult. Some environmental factors that have been linked to autoimmune
disease include: bacterial and viral infections, exposure to chemical and physical
agents, smoking, nutritional imbalance, and therapeutic drugs such as procainamide.
Recently attention has been directed towards the cellular and tissue damage
that is generated by environmental triggers that are present for a long period
of time (2). Inevitably irreversible cellular damage, necrosis (cell death)
and the formation of excessive amounts of cell debris will occur. The debris
contains an abundance of intracellular antigens that have been physically damaged,
chemically altered or were from privileged sites normally sequestered from the
immune system. Monocyte and tissue macrophages are responsible for the uptake
and removal of cellular debris. However, if there is too much to remove, a large
quantity of debris will remain in circulation. Lymphocytes will react to the
damaged intracellular antigens as “non-self,” mount an immune response
and set the autoimmune process in motion.
The preponderance of autoimmune diseases in females is striking.
It is apparent that gender and female hormones play a role in the induction
of autoimmune diseases. The influence of reproductive hormones on systemic lupus
erythematosus is noteworthy. The incidence of lupus is highest in women during
their childbearing years with a female to male ratio of 9:1. Pregnancy may exacerbate
the disease and contribute to periodic flare-ups characteristic of SLE. Female
hormones have also been associated with myasthenia gravis, rheumatoid arthritis,
and systemic sclerosis.
AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE
The presence of autoantibodies occurs to a certain degree
in all normal individuals. Autoimmune disease is the pathological consequence
of an ongoing autoimmune process. In a recent Danish study (3) 1 in 20 individuals
in the general population were found to have autoimmune disease. Autoimmune
diseases are generally classified into two different categories: organ specific
and systemic. Organ specific autoimmune diseases generally develop as the result
of an autoantibody being produced to a specific tissue or organ. Therefore,
the disease process and/or tissue destruction remains limited to the specific
organ. Some of the diseases included in this category are Hashimoto’s
thyroiditis, Graves' disease, myasthenia gravis, Addison’s disease, pernicious
anemia, and pemphigus vulgaris. Systemic autoimmune disorders are not organ
specific and cause tissue injury and inflammation to several organs throughout
the body. Systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) such as SLE, RA, Sjogren’s
syndrome, scleroderma, mixed connective tissue disease, and dermatomyositis
are the primary disorders within this group.
DETECTION OF AUTOANTIBODIES IN THE CLINICAL LABORATORY
A key component in the clinical diagnosis of SARD is the
detection of autoantibodies in the suspected patient’s serum. Testing
for anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) is the traditional laboratory screening procedure
used for diagnosis of a SARD. ANA are autoantibodies directed against nuclear
antigens and cytoplasmic proteins located in cells. The indirect immunofluorescence
(IIF) assay using human epithelial cells (Hep-2) as the substrate is considered
the gold standard for the detection of ANA. Commercially prepared microscopic
slides with the Hep-2 cell substrate are now available. A consistent problem
with the Hep-2 substrate has been the unreliable detection of the SSA/Ro antigen.
Hep-2 cell lines can be transfected now with the insertion of the gene responsible
for the expression of the 60kd native Ro peptide. Consequently, there are ample
quantities of the autoantigen present in the Hep-2 cells. The patient’s
serum is incubated with the glass slide containing the Hep-2 substrate. If an
ANA is present, it will bind to the specific antigen present on the substrate.
A fluoresceinated anti-human antibody is added that will bind to the ANA-antigen
complex. The slide is examined under a fluorescent microscope.
ANA react primarily to antigens present within the nucleus,
nucleolus and various cytoplasmic organelles. Distinct staining patterns are
seen. Those seen most commonly are homogeneous, rim, speckled, centromere, and
nucleolar. Traditionally, the IIF staining pattern(s) identified reflected different
antigenic specificities, thereby providing a guide to further testing. However,
the pattern type does not always correlate reliably to specific antibodies present
and cannot be regarded as definitive. It must also be pointed out that low titers
of ANA do not always indicate autoimmune disease. They are normally found in
healthy individuals and their presence can increase with age. ANA can also be
detected in infectious diseases such as hepatitis, mononucleosis, tuberculosis,
and subacute bacterial endocarditis. IIF ANA testing is highly sensitive and
a titer of greater than 1:160 is usually considered diagnostic and more likely
to be clinically significant. IIF ANA detection is still the most widely used
method in clinical laboratories. However, the technique is laborious and pattern
recognition can be subjective and is often dependent on the skill and experience
of the Clinical Laboratory Scientist interpreting the slides.
Today, laboratories testing large numbers of patients’
samples can use commercially-produced EIA- ANA kits as a screening procedure.
In the kit, a Hep2 extract containing various ANA antigens is bound to the surface
of each well on the microliter plate. A positive result from an EIA testing
of ANA can be verified by IIF ANA.
Irrespective of which screening method is used for ANA detection,
more definitive testing is needed to establish what specific autoantibody is
present. Historically, laboratories have relied on a number of techniques including
ouchterlony diffusion, radiolabeled immunoassays, counterimmunoelectrophoresis
and immunoblots to identify the antibody present. Today, EIA testing using recombinant
or affinity-purified native autoantigens has replaced the older techniques in
many laboratories. Many commercially prepared EIA kits contain panels of 5 or
more autoantigens that can be run on each patient.
Emerging Technologies
Several new technologies, which are faster and not as labor intensive, have
been developed to identify autoantibodies present in the patient’s serum.
Line immunoassay (LIA) is a technique that allows for simultaneous detection
of multiple autoantibodies present in a patient’s serum using nitrocellulose
strips coated with highly purified recombinant autoantigens (4). Twenty autoantigens
can be coated to each strip and each autoantigen corresponds to a fine line
on the strip. Although the strips resemble those used in Western blots, there
is no electrophoresis or blotting with LIA. A patient’s serum is incubated
with one strip. Visible inspection of the strip is used to determine the presence
of autoantibodies. Computer software packages are also available for analysis
of the strip.
Technologies based on multiplexing have emerged as well. Multiplex assays test
a patient’s serum sample for the simultaneous detection of multiple antibodies
in one microtiter well (4). Instead of one autoantigen per well, several autoantigens
are placed in one well. The technology is a fluorescein based microparticle
assay. Individual beads (microspheres) are coated with 2 distinct fluorescent
dyes to produce different levels of color intensity. Each set of microspheres,
representing a specific level of color intensity, is conjugated by covalent
binding to a particular autoantigen. All the bead sets are mixed together and
placed in each well of a microtiter plate permitting several different autoantigens
to be present in one well. A patient’s sample is added to one well and
the autoantibodies, if present, will bind to the specific autoantigen-coated
beads. A fluoresceinated anti-human IgG is added and binds to autoantibodies
attached to antigen coated beads. The sample is analyzed in a flow cytometer
(Luminex) and each bead passes through the flow cell. One laser will identify
the color of an autoantigen-coded bead by discriminating the different excitation
wavelengths caused by the intensity of the two different fluorescent dyes coating
the beads. The second laser will measure the concentration of each autoantibody
present by measuring the quantity of fluoresceinated anti-human IgG bound to
each bead. Laboratories must abide by proper standardization and internal validation
procedures with any of these new technologies.
CONCLUSION
Numerous studies have demonstrated that many autoimmune diseases are generally
preceded by a period of time when only the autoantibodies are present (5). The
actual disease process and clinical manifestations may not become apparent for
months to years later. Therefore, can the identification of autoantibodies in
high risk (genetically predisposed) individuals be used as a marker of future
disease? The detection of strongly expressed patterns of autoantibodies by multiplex
testing may identify future autoimmune disease and lead to the utilization of
preventive measures. Additionally, the elucidation of the genetic markers involved
in autoimmune disease will lead to a better understanding of this extremely
complex group of diseases.
REFERENCES
1. Gregersen PK, Behrens TW. Genetics of autoimmune diseases-disorders of immune
homeostasis. Nature Rev Genetics. 2006;9:917-928.
2. Mackay IR, Leskovsek NV, Rose NR. Cell damage and autoimmunity: A critical
appraisal. J Autoimmun. 2008;30:5-11.
3. Eaton WW, Rose NR, Kalaydjian A, Pedersen MG, Mortensen PB. Epidemiology
of autoimmune disease in Denmark. J Autoimmun. 2007;29:1-9.
4. Tozzoli R. Recent advances in diagnostic technologies and their impact in
autoimmune diseases. Autoimmunity Rev. 2007;6:34-340.
5. Shepshelovich D, Shoenfeld Y. Prediction and prevention of autoimmune diseases:
additional aspects of the mosaic of autoimmunity. Lupus 2006;15:183-190.