California
Association
for
Medical Laboratory Technology
Distance Learning Program
|
Human Genome
Project: Second in a Series Course
Number: DL-971 © California Association
for Medical Laboratory Technology. CAMLT is approved by the California Department
of Health Services 1895 Mowry Ave, Suite 112 Notification of Distance Learning Deadline This is a reminder that all the continuing education units required to renew your license must be earned no later than the expiration date printed on your license. If some of your units are made up of Distance Learning courses, please allow yourself enough time to retake the testin the event you do not pass on the first attempt. CAMLT urges you to earn your CE units early! |
| This course is configured to be completed on-line. You can register
for the course, submit secure payment using a credit card via PayPal,
take the quiz on-line and receive your graded score.
If you pass, your certificate will be mailed to you from
the CAMLT office. If you fail, you must submit new payment and obtain a new PayPal receipt each time you take the test. A certificate will be issued only if you have paid for re-taking the course and you pass the test. If you want to submit your registration and quiz via fax or mail you should print the Adobe Acrobat version of the course which includes the required Registration/Quiz form. |
| Links to: On-line REGISTRATION, PAYMENT and QUIZ Printable Acrobat version of this course * Review Questions at the end of this Course Other Distance Learning Courses |
|
Human Genome Project: Second in a Series
Abstract:
This course provides a discussion and overview of the Human Genome Project.
From conception to completion, the project moved forward at a rate paced by
technological advances and the competitive drive of researchers around the world.
Much has been learned about the human genome as well as the genomes of other
organisms due to the Human Genome Project. Much work is left in deciphering
the data and putting it to useful applications. As stated by the U.S. Department
of Energy (DOE), “Available to researchers worldwide, the human genome
reference sequence provides a magnificent and unprecedented biological resource
that will serve throughout the century as a basis for research and discovery
and, ultimately, myriad practical applications”. Rapid progress in genome
science and a glimpse into its potential applications have spurred observers
to predict that biology will be the foremost science of the 21st century. Technology
and resources generated by the Human Genome Project and other genomics research
are already having a major impact on research across the life sciences as well
as human diagnostics.
Objectives:
At the end of this exercise, participants will be able to:
Introduction:
The Human Genome Project (HGP) refers to the international 13-year effort to
discover all the estimated 20,000-25,000 human genes and make them accessible
for further biological study. Another project goal was to determine the complete
sequence of the 3 billion DNA subunits (bases) in the human genome. As part
of the HGP, parallel studies were carried out on selected model organisms such
as the bacterium, Escherichia coli, and the mouse, Mus musculus, to help develop
the technology and interpret human gene function. The DOE Human Genome Program
and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Human Genome Research Institute
(NHGRI) together sponsored the U.S. Human Genome Project.
Conceived in 1986, the U.S. Human Genome Project formally began in 1990 and
ended in 2003. Interestingly, the project began as an initiative in the U.S.
Department of Energy. The project originally was planned to last 15 years, but
rapid technological advances accelerated the completion date to 2003. The DOE
and the NIH brought a proposal entitled, “Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance,
The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years (FY 1991-1995)” to
members of congress in February of 1990. The approval they sought needed the
funding of 200 million dollars per year for the next 15 years. The document
outlined the current state of genome science at that time, proposed joint roles
for DOE and NIH in administering research agendas, set the stage for international
collaboration and provided goals for the project.
The completion in the spring of 2003 of the human DNA sequence project proposed
by the DOE and NIH coincided with the 50th anniversary of Watson and Crick’s
description of the fundamental structure of DNA. Some 18 countries participated
in the worldwide effort producing an amazing database of genomic information
that continues to grow. The analytical power arising from the reference DNA
sequences of the entire human genome and other model organisms determined during
the Human Genome Project has created genomics resources that have jump-started
what some call the “biology century.”
Goals of the Human Genome Project were set forth from the beginning to help guide the process. The initial proposal set forth the following five-year goals for the human genome project:
Timeline: The timeline that follows comes from the U.S. Department of Energy’s
Department of Science. It is a sparse detailing of significant achievements
related to the Human Genome Project.
• 1990: W. French Anderson applies gene therapy for the first time. The
recipient is a young girl with ADA deficiency, an immune system disorder.
The Department of Energy and the National Institutes of Health formally launch
the Human Genome Project, a 15-year international effort to locate all of the
genes in the human genome and make them accessible for further biological study.
Another goal of the project is to determine and complete sequence of the genome’s
3 billion DNA nucleotide base pairs.
• 1992: Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory in California discover a gene present in 25 to 30 percent
of the population that predisposes individuals to increased heart attack risk.
Discovery of this marker for heart disease on chromosome 19 may make possible
the development of a simple test to screen humans for susceptibility to heart
disease.
England’s Wellcome Trust joins the Human Genome Project.
• 1994: The Department of Energy launches its Microbial Genome Program.
• 1995: Craig Venter and colleagues at The Institute for Genomic Research in Maryland
decode the first whole genome of a free-living single-cell organism, the influenza
microbe, using the whole-genome shotgun sequencing method.
• 1996: Ian Wilmut and other researchers at Scotland’s
Roslin Institute clone a sheep from the cell of an adult ewe. This non-sexually
produced animal is named “Dolly.”
The complete genome of the E.
coli bacterium is sequenced.
• 1998: The first complete genome sequence of a multicellular
organism, the roundworm C. elegans, is published.
• 1999: The DOE Joint Genome Institute, a genome-sequencing center formed by Lawrence
Berkeley, Lawrence Livermore, and Los Alamos national laboratories, dedicates
its new production sequencing facility in Walnut Creek, California.
The complete genome of the Drosophila fruit fly is sequenced.
• 2000: Working drafts of the human genome are completed by the public International
Human Genome Project and by Craig Venter’s Celera Genomics, a private
company.
• 2001: The draft human genome sequence is published in the journals Nature and
Science. Twenty sequencing centers in six countries – China, France, Germany,
England, Japan, and the United States – contribute to the project. Most
of the sequencing is done by five major centers: the Wellcome Trust’s
Sanger Center in England, the DOE Joint Genome Institute in California, and
three NIH-funded centers at Baylor College of Medicine in Texas, Washington
University School of Medicine in Missouri, and the Whitehead Institute in Massachusetts.
• 2001-2002: As rapid, highly accurate sequencing techniques become readily available,
the complete genomes of a wide variety of microbes and model organisms, including
the mouse, pufferfish, malaria mosquito, and sea squirt, are sequenced and analyzed.
Genome comparisons yield significant new insights into the causes and progress
of disease, biological evolution, and the relationship between organisms and
the environment.
DOE launches its “Genomes to Life” program.
• 2003: The finished human genome is published concurrent with the 50th Anniversary
of the discovery of the double helix.
Results:
The Human Genome Project was marked by accelerated progress. In June 2000, the
rough draft of the human genome was completed a year ahead of schedule. In February
2001, Science and Nature published special issues containing the working draft
sequence of the human genome and analysis of that sequence. By 2003, two full
years ahead of time, the sequencing of the human genome was complete. The rapid
completion was due to the enormous commitment to developing technology and changing
strategies that resulted in revised goals and plans as the project moved forward.
However, the sequencing is more a beginning than a final step. Knowing the sequence
is analogous to having a dictionary and needing to make an extraordinary proclamation.
The information is there but complete concept and interpretation have yet to
be put forward.
A unique aspect of the U.S. Human Genome Project is that it was the first large
scientific undertaking to address potential ELSI implications arising from project
data. Another important feature of the project was the federal government’s
long-standing dedication to the transfer of technology to the private sector.
By licensing technologies to private companies and awarding grants for innovative
research, the project catalyzed the multibillion-dollar U.S. biotechnology industry
and fostered the development of new medical applications.
Sequence and analysis of the human genome working draft was published in February
2001 and April 2003 issues of Nature and Science. The first panoramic views
of the human genetic landscape have revealed a wealth of information and some
early surprises. Much remains to be deciphered in this vast trove of information;
as the consortium of HGP scientists concluded in their seminal paper, “…
the more we learn about the human genome, the more there is to explore.”
A few highlights from the first publications analyzing the sequence follow:
The table that follows compares humans with other organisms in regards to genome size and the estimated number of genes.
| Organism | Genome Size (Bases) | Estimated Genes |
|---|---|---|
| Human (Homo sapiens) | 3 billion | 30,000 |
| Laboratory mouse (M. musculus) | 2.6 billion | 30,000 |
| Mustard weed (A. thaliana) | 100 million | 25,000 |
| Roundworm (C. elegans) | 97 million | 19,000 |
| Fruit fly (D. melanogaster) | 137 million | 13,000 |
| Yeast (S. cerevisiae) | 12.1 million | 6,000 |
| Bacterium (E. coli) | 4.6 million | 3,200 |
| Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) | 9700 | 9 |
The estimated number of human genes is only one-third as great as previously
thought; although the numbers may be revised as more computational and experimental
analyses are performed. Scientists suggest that the genetic key to human complexity
lies not in gene number but in how gene parts are used to build different
products in a process called alternative splicing. Other underlying reasons
for greater complexity are the thousands of chemical modification made to
proteins and the repertoire of regulatory mechanisms controlling these processes.
Some current and potential applications of genome research include:
• Molecular medicine
• Energy sources and environmental applications
• Risk assessment
• Bioarchaeology, anthropology, evolution, and human migration
• DNA forensics (identification)
• Agriculture, livestock breeding, and bioprocessing
In addition to the genomic research, the Department of Energy and the National
Institutes of Health Genome Programs set aside 3% to 5% of their respective
annual HGP budgets for the study of the project’s ethical, legal, and
social issues. Nearly $1 million was spent on HGP ELSI research during the
Human Genome Project.
A tabular summary of some of the sequencing milestones from the Human Genome
Project follows:
| Area | HGP Goal | Standard Achieved | Date Achieved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genetic Map | 2- to 5-cM resolution map (600 – 1,500 markers) | 1-cM resolution map (3,000 markers) | September 1994 |
| Physical Map | 30,000 STSs | 52,000 STSs | October 1998 |
| DNA Sequence | 95% of gene-containing part of human sequence finished to 99.99% accuracy | 99% of gene-containing part of human sequence finished to 99.99% accuracy | April 2003 |
| Capacity and Cost of Finished Sequence | Sequence 500 Mb/year at < $0.25 per finished base | Sequence > 1,400 Mb/year at <$0.09 per finished base | November 2002 |
| Human Sequence Variation | 100,000 mapped human SNPs | 3.7 million mapped human SNPs | February 2003 |
| Gene Identification | Full-length human cDNAs | 15,000 full-length human cDNAs | March 2003 |
| Model Organisms | Complete genome sequences of E. coli, S. cerevisiae, C. elegans, D. melanogaster | Finished genome sequences of E. coli, S. cerevisiae, C. elegans, D. melanogaster, plus whole-genome drafts of several others, including C. briggsae, D. pseudoobscura, mouse and rat | April 2003 |
| Functional Analysis | Develop genomic-scale technologies | High-throughput oligonucleotide synthesis | 1994 |
| DNA microarrays | 1996 | ||
| Eukaryotic, whole-genome knockouts (yeast) | 1999 | ||
| Scale-up of two-hybrid system for protein-protein interaction | 2002 |
Review Questions - Course #DL-971 - Choose the one best answer
for each question
Link to On-line REGISTRATION, PAYMENT and QUIZ